Effect of Ramipril and of Rosiglitazone on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in People With Impaired Glucose Tolerance or Impaired Fasting GlucoseSTARR (STudy of Atherosclerosis with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone)

Lonn, E M and Gerstein, H C and Sheridan, P and Smith, S and Diaz, R and Mohan, V and Bosch, J and Yusuf, S and Dagenais, G R (2009) Effect of Ramipril and of Rosiglitazone on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in People With Impaired Glucose Tolerance or Impaired Fasting GlucoseSTARR (STudy of Atherosclerosis with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone). Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53 (22). pp. 2028-35. ISSN 07351097

[img]PDF
Restricted to MDRF users only. Others may ->

331Kb

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril and the thiazolidinedione (TZD) rosiglitazone on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in people with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and/or impaired fasting glucose (IFG). Background People with IGT and/or IFG are at increased long-term risk for cardiovascular disease. Effects of ACE inhibitors and of TZDs on vascular disease in this population are unknown. Methods One thousand four hundred twenty-five people with IGT and/or IFG but without cardiovascular disease or diabetes were randomized to ramipril 15 mg/day or its placebo and to rosiglitazone 8 mg/day or its placebo with a 2 2 factorial design. The primary study outcome was the annualized change of the aggregate maximum CIMT, computed as the average of the maximum CIMTs across 12 carotid arterial segments. The secondary study outcome was the annualized change of the mean far wall left and right common CIMT. Median follow-up was 3 years and carotid ultrasound examinations were obtained at baseline and yearly thereafter. Results There were no differences in the primary and secondary outcomes between the ramipril and placebo groups. Compared with placebo, rosiglitazone reduced the primary CIMT outcome, but the difference was not statistically significant (difference 0.0027 0.0015 mm/year; p 0.08) and significantly reduced the secondary CIMT outcome (difference 0.0043 0.0017 mm/year; p 0.01). Conclusions In people with IGT and/or IFG without cardiovascular disease and diabetes, treatment with ramipril had a neutral effect on CIMT, whereas rosiglitazone modestly reduced CIMT progression. (The Study of Atherosclerosis With Ramipril and Rosiglitazone; NCT00140647). (J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:2028–35) © 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Item Type:Article
Official URL/DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.072
Uncontrolled Keywords:impaired glucose tolerance (IGT);impaired fasting glucose (IFG);risk of cardiovascular (CV);STudy of Atherosclerosis with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone)
Subjects:Diabetes Clinical Trials > Randomized Trial
Diabetes Epidemiology
Diabetology > Cardiovascular Diabetology
Divisions:Department of Epidemiology
Department of Diabetology
Department of Clinical Trials
ID Code:209
Deposited By:INVALID USER
Deposited On:24 Nov 2009 09:57
Last Modified:24 Nov 2009 09:57

Repository Staff Only: item control page