Min Feng Ooi, B and Muschialli, L and Kondal, D and Andia, G and Ng Ho Tsun, Ivy and Huang, H Y R and Singh, K and Aggarwal, A and Ali, M K and Tandon, N and Narayan, K M V and Mohan, V and Dhillon, P K and Gillespie, T W and Prabhakaran, D and Goodman, M and Shridhar, K (2024) Individual-level determinants of breast and cervical cancer screening and early testing in two regionally representative urban Indian populations. Preventive Medicine Reports, 46 . p. 102883. ISSN 22113355
![]() | PDF 496Kb |
Abstract
Introduction: Region-specific data on individual factors associated with uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening or early testing in diverse Indian populations are limited. Aim: To assess the prevalence and individual determinants of uptake of breast and/or cervical cancer screening or testing among women aged 30-69 years in regionally representative populations of two large Indian cities: New Delhi and Chennai. Methods: We conducted an analysis of the cross-sectional data (2016-2017) nested within the Centre for Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction in South Asia cohort, established in 2010-2011 with 12,271 participants (5365 in New Delhi; 6906 in Chennai). Among 3310 women participants, we evaluated the associations of demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, medical, psychosocial, and reproductive factors with breast and/or cervical cancer screening or testing using multivariable logistic regression models with results expressed as adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: At any point prior to 2016-2017, 193 women self-reported having undergone evaluations for breast and/or cervical cancer. The reasons for evaluation were 'general examination' or 'physician's advice' (i.e., screening) or 'being symptomatic' (i.e., early testing). The overall prevalence was 5.8% for screening or testing and 2.5% for screening alone. Formal education (OR:1.88; 95% CI:1.12-3.15), high monthly household income (OR:2.27; 95% CI:1.59-3.25) and less 'fear-of-judgement' (OR:1.65; 95% CI:1.05-2.58) were positively associated with screening or testing uptake. When screening uptake was analysed separately, the results were generally similar. Conclusion: Our findings may have important implications for interventions at community-level (e.g., reducing 'fear-of-judgement', increasing awareness to screening programs and early symptoms) and health-system level (e.g., opportunistic screening).
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL/DOI: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102883 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Breast cancer; CARRS; Cancer screening; Cancer stigma; Cervical cancer; India; |
Subjects: | Diabetes Epidemiology Diabetes |
Divisions: | Department of Epidemiology Department of Diabetology |
ID Code: | 1480 |
Deposited By: | surendar radha |
Deposited On: | 28 Sep 2024 10:14 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2024 10:14 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page